Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Here’s the column of Bong Austero, vice president of the People Management Association of the Philippines (PMAP). When Aquino challenged Villar in a one-on-one debate, the latter accepted the challenged. PMAP took the opportunity and invited both senators to a debate. Villar backed out during the last minute.

Liberal Party presidential candidate Senator Benigno Aquino III recently expressed exasperation that the issues discussed in the series of presidential forums have become repetitive and tended to focus too much on populist shtick rather than on the more substantive issues hounding the nation.

He then challenged Senator Manny Villar, the candidate who is widely seen as his closest rival for the presidency, to a one-on-one debate; a challenge Villar immediately accepted. Villar shot back: Name the place and the venue. A sidelight to that verbal scuffle was Brother Eddie Villanueva’s attempt to insert himself into the picture saying that if Aquino and Villar were going to debate mano a mano, then he also should be there even if only to serve as a referee.

I cite this back story because it just so happened that the professional organization of which I am currently vice president, the People Management Association of the Philippines (the national organization of human resource management professionals in the country) was also at that time organizing its own series of presidential forums. What we had in mind was a format involving two or at most three presidential candidates at a time. Coincidentally, the plan was to invite Aquino and Villar to the first forum. So we jumped at the opportunity and made the necessary arrangements.

I say this with no malice intended: Inviting Aquino and Villar was a complicated and nerve-wracking experience. Up to day of the forum, we were never really sure if both, or either, or neither would show up. I’ve organized quite a number of national conferences myself and I familiar with the difficulties involved in getting the rich, the famous, and the notorious to speak or show up at a public event. Nothing prepared me for the kind of backroom negotiations that had to be made. But after a lot of wheeling and dealing, both camps accepted the invitation. There was also a lot of briefing and coaching on the talking points and the format of the forum. I don’t really know anymore how it came to pass but somewhere along the way, Brother Eddie Villanueva’s participation became part of the arrangement.

Aquino and Villanueva did show up. Villar chickened out at the last minute. If Villar thought human resource managers can easily be dispensed with, he has another thought coming. We directly influence millions of workers—we’re the gatekeepers of information and learning in industry, we’re also the people directly responsible for managing and developing those employed in the private sector.

A friend in media who covers the presidential candidates intimated to me that notwithstanding the bravado he displayed in responding to the Aquino challenge to a one-on-one debate, Villar is actually uncomfortable in forums where Aquino is also present because the crowd inevitably gravitates towards the latter.

This was exactly what happened last week at the PMAP forum. I take my hats off to Brother Eddie Villanueva who must really be such a humble man not to take offense at the fact that people mobbed Aquino and relegated him to the sidelines. I can understand how such a spectacle would be a blow to Villar’s ego. Whether it is on the wane or not, the Aquino magic is a real phenomenon.

The general perception is that there is an ocean of difference between the public persona and who a person really is up close. Television, which is the most popular medium today, brings candidates into our bedrooms and living rooms and magnifies their supposed strengths and weaknesses —their brilliance, nervous gestures, warts, thinning hair, and all. But for all its vaunted power, television has limitations. For one, it has to appeal to as many types of constituents and therefore tends to be superficial in treatment. There is no substitute for small forums that function like town hall meetings focused on specific concerns and issues. In fact, town hall meetings have been staple fixtures in the presidential elections in the United States since the eighties.

But then again, it really still boils down to the readiness and capability of candidates to provide incisive and in-depth answers to questions asked of them. I have noted that even when our presidential candidates are asked direct questions that call for specifics such as action plans and timelines, they still tend to answer with motherhood statements and broad strokes.

I was a little disappointed that at the PMAP forum, Senator Aquino couldn’t be more specific with his answers despite the fact that he had just complained, just a couple of weeks ago, about what he thought was the lack of substantive discussions in the various presidential forums. When asked, for example, how long it would take his administration to fix the mismatch problem and at what cost, he hemmed and hawed and skimmed through the surface. The moderator had to try to pin him down to talk specifics. Still, it was the moderator who had to synthesize his thoughts to come up with a specific answer: About two years, with money to be sourced from the gaps in the tax collection efforts, which would be more than enough.

If Aquino was non-committal and tended to be superficial, Villanueva was clearly oblivious of the issues. His stock answer to everything and anything was a variation of the same refrain: The problem in this country is the lack of a sense of righteousness and that he and his party would lead by example. Villanueva had specific talking points, which he had clearly mastered—memorized even—and he never strayed from these points.

There is more about Aquino that does not register on television and in other mass media channels. He is far more eloquent and engaging in person although he does tend to display non-verbal messages that seem to indicate impatience. Others have labeled these as indicative of being “petulant.” I think the senator just needs to learn to be more tolerant of criticism. At the PMAP forum, he expressed exasperation at our political system which bred incompetence and stymied innovative and long-term solutions. When the moderator cut him off with the observation that inability to change the status quo and failure to get things done within the system could also be interpreted as failure in leadership, the senator continued to whine about what he had not been allowed to do. The senator justified himself by saying he chose not to be popular.

Aquino, however, earned brownie points from me for being sincere and authentic. What I liked most about him was the fact that he didn’t try to come across as a “know-it-all,” he carried with him a folder—presumably containing statistics and various data—which he flipped through during the forum. He drank water straight from a bottle, didn’t ask for star treatment (in fact he refused to enter the room when someone else was talking because he didn’t want to interrupt), and even stayed even if he was already late for another appointment just to accommodate members of the audience who wanted to have pictures taken with him.

I still haven’t decided on who to vote for President but I know this for a fact after having met Senator Aquino, sat with him on the same table, and listened to him parry difficult questions from our group: A Noynoy Aquino presidency would not be such a bad thing.

Walking the Fame

Yesterday, after my interview in IBM, I had the chance to walk around Eastwood’s Walk of Fame. Practically, it’s a duplication of Hollywood’s Walk of Fame (as the name itself suggests). The only difference is that you don’t get to see Hollywood greats in there. Instead, Filipino classics and all-time acting gods and goddesses are there (though some of them just bumped their way to the list). Here are some of the great actresses who can be seen in the Walk of Fame:

Charito Solis, the Meryl Streep of Philippine Cinema

The Great Anita Linda. Still alive, still making quality films.

Nida Blanca. The actress who can do no wrong.

Atang Dela Rama. The actress who started it all…

I don’t know what she’s doing in here. :-)

Yu Na KinThe ladies event in one of the most exciting in figure skating and I skipped classes in order to catch this.

Clearly, it was Yu Na Kim’s night. This is her first free skare this season where she skated cleanly – no falls, popped jumps or downgrades. I knew from the start that she’ll take the gold medal, but that’s because I thought that her competition will falter. Especially her rival Mao Asada. Asada proved herself to be very vulnerable especially during the last two seasons.

Yu Na opened with a gorgeous triple lutz-triple toe – her nemesis jump all season, either ending up with a downgrade or a pop. She continued with a triple flip, double axel, her signature double axel-triple toe loop, triple salchow and another triple lutz. As usual, she accompanied her performance with very nice spins, footwork and transitions. And those were enough to secure her a record-breaking score and an Olympic gold medal.

Joannie Rochette

Joannie Rochette showed everyone the true definition of an athelete. Though with a very heavy heart, she skated through her long program with poise and grace despite the visible errors. In an ordinary competition, she would have dropped to fourth place, but her performance was made more beautiful by her courage and strength despite the tragedy that had happened to her.

Tonight, it is not only Yu Na Kim who broke world records. Her rival Mao Asada of Japan also did. She attempted and successfully landed three triple axels – the first from any lady. The axel had been her friend and nemesis for years, but Mao was consistent, persevering and determined enough to attempt them, let alone land them. (FYI, the Axel is the hardest triple jump. It costs many points when landed cleanly, and knocks off much too when downgraded or landed uncleanly.)

I am happy for the winners. They are all deserving. Though I am expecting this lineup months ago, I am still quite surprised (but happy) by how well the did tonight. Great job!

Actress Cookies

Oscar Cookies

Love love love these cookies! Especially the Meryl Streep ones. I bet those are yummy!

Sister Aloysius Says…

William London is a fidgety boy. He would set his foot on fire for half a day out of school

Really?! Will any student do that? Especially UP students who crave for sleep and hunger for social life? This blog really brings out the whiner in me.

Joannie Rochette is a Canadian Dream. She is six-time Canadian ladies figure skating champion, reigning Worlds silver medallist and fifth at the Olympics in Turin. She edged Japanese sensation and 2008 World Champion Mao Asada during the Four Continents Championships last year, finishing second over the Japanese wonder. Her 2009 season is as brilliant as well. She is one of the strong contenders for the medal (of any color). With the Olympics in her home soil, she just have to skate cleanly in order to medal.

However, her world turned upside-down just before the games when she heard that her mother, Therese, died of a massive heart attack upon arrival in Vancouver. It was more than learning that her mother can’t attend her graduation day, or her wedding. Joannie is just one skate (actually, two – the short and the long program) from her ultimate dream, but it seems like everything is taken away from her, now that her mother will never see her skate again.

Joannie isn’t one of my favorite skaters. In fact, I find her skating quite bland especially when against Yu-Na Kim’s or Mao Asada’s.  It was only last season that she gained her top form. I wasn’t entirely convinced until she repeated her victories this season. Honestly, I am rooting for Kim to win the gold.

But these recent events changed my view on her. It was very hard enough to skate in practice after you learned that your mother died, let alone skate in competition. She had barely grieved for her mother and yet, she’ll be up in the spotlight, trying to steal the show from the other competitors and making sure she maintain her lead. It’ll be the toughest skate from anyone in competition, including one who has triple Axels in both of her programs.

I want Kim to win. But I won’t mind Rochette taking the gold. She has just proven how a great athlete she is. I will be among the 20,000 Olympic viewers who will be behind her back when she finally hits the Olympic ice.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.